Dream on...
Indonesia is nonblock country, dont expect Indonesia will be either on US side or China side. LOL.
Trust me, US still need to think twice... thats why she hasn't attack China yet till now.
US + Europe + Japan + SKorea + Taiwan + Australia can't gangbang China + Rusia + North...
If J-10C equipped with PL15 / PL21, my bet will goes to J10C
PL15 will enable J-10C to initiate first shoot on F-16 from distance 200km - 250kmaway.
PL21 from 400km away
It was not F-15EX that jammed J-16D; perhaps from powerful source on AWACS or ship based jammer?
And I doubt AESA on J-16D can be jammed; maybe it was PESA on J-11B.
Assuming that report is correct.
The report said J-10C win against SU35 consistently, hence left small room for possibility of chinese SU35 win during all mock exercises in China. Except you said the report is a lie.
J-10C and J16 are 4.5 generation.
They both beat SU-35 consistently during mock exercises in China
On paper J16 has more potent than F-15E.
J-16 brings PL15 and PL21 with max range beyond 400km, plus AESA 1800 TR.
F-15EX is not equipped with an optoelectronic distributed aperture detection...
The statement you provide is incorrect. Let's break down the points:
Theoretical Maximum Energy Density: It is true that the energy density of the most electro-positive elements (like lithium, sodium, and potassium) is limited due to their atomic properties. In batteries, the energy density is...
No I didn't. You that started to say "china physics" which mean it is impossible (according to real physical law) for plane to use battery as source of energy in the future.
You must show physics law that prevent possibility of battery from any material/with any technology to narrow the gap with kerosene in term of energy density, if you say it is impossible for human technology to reach such a battery in the future. Can you?
Current situation:
Amprius Li-on battery already able to reach 1/10 of Kerosen in term of energy density.
Possible future battery technology for plane:
Graphene batteries. Graphene is a material that has a number of properties that make it ideal for battery use, including high conductivity...
That make sense if China use DUV Lithography to produce 7nm. Because it require multipaterning that will produce more waste than using single paterning with EUV Lithography.
Nope, the most advanced Kirin chipset was challenging the most advanced from Qualcomm and Apple/Bionic at that time before the ban.
It was due to the chip ban that prevent most advanced Kirin to be produced by TSMC and other chip foundries.
Yes.
And on the top of that Gallium-based compounds, is used in the production of specialized components such as lasers or detectors that are integrated into lithography systems. Similarly, germanium-based materials may find applications in certain optics or sensors within the lithography...
LOLs. What a clueless strawman :laugh:
TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), one of the world's largest semiconductor foundries, does require gallium for certain chip fabrication processes. Gallium-based compounds, such as gallium arsenide (GaAs) and gallium nitride (GaN), are...
When will you stop BS & being illogical? If red mud is already the main source of industrial production of gallium as per you claim, then why no one use red mud to produce gallium? care to explain?
LOLs.
None.
But your chip development progress will be halted due to scarcity of gallium...
5 years of gallium scarcity is enough time to make Western - Taiwan - Korea & Japan chip industry a mess, and enough time for China to produce EUV Lithography @dbc @Hamartia Antidote @gambit
Then your argument has no meaning except total BS circling around.
Bayer process is not helping you to produce Gallium. As I've told you before: producing gallium from red mud is still challenging economically and technically. The concentration of gallium in red mud is typically low, making it...