Search results

When did I say it is easy? lol Well, it depend on the experience and resources; just like build a super highrise building, it could take 5 years to complete, but it could take less than 1 year if you have enough resource and method. Big shipyard like Jiangnan? it take long time for some less...

And this could be the reason why China cancel/postpone the development of Type 004.

Yes I do. I am not saying making shipyard is easy, I am saying shipyard is not a complex system like chip fab, understand the difference. You know, many developing country can make shipyard. My country Indonesia can, and have many shipyard made by ourself. In the meantime, only some advance...

As I said it is not about sea coverage, it is about parity with US Naval power. LOL. Shipyard is not a very complex system like a chip fab. What make you think it has to take that long 5 years to finish a shipyard? With massive resource China can build it fast; replicating Jiangnan shipyard...

Type 003 probably in same league with latest USS Ford class. The dimension is almost similar, hence the tonnage could be almost the same also. If type 003 turn out to be nuclear powered, China doesnt need another slightly larger nuclear AC type 004 anytime in this or coming decade.

Yea, it is a good opportunity for China to narrow the gap with USN.

China doesn't need to have naval power presence in Atlantic. Naval supremacy could mean the very strong naval power competing or even surpassing USN. Yes China should be able to project her naval power to Atlantic or any sea on earth, but not necessarily be stationed there. Busy shipyards...

China has enough learnt from history, that when her military was not strong enough her #1 status as economic superpower could not be sustained. What China's navy is relying currently is "asymmetrical warfare" with her DF-21/26/17 instead of parity with USN in term of tonnage and fire power; but...

China will have global ambition as soon as her economy become #1. This is needed to protect her global trading from disruption. It does not necessarily mean intention to invade other country like US invaded Iraq/Libya/Afghanistan. Why is it impossible for country with massive industrial...

Why no? If China can produce 1 carrier per year or two, she will already have minimum 7 carrier by 2030, or even 10. Not to mention destroyer, subs, and LHD.

2050 is too far. I think by 2030 China can achieve supremacy already.

So that means you should already known your media reputation for overblowing and unfounded news.

When covid outbreak in Wuhan, there are several video of testimony like this from anonyme chinese regarding how oppressive the goverment action, but the problem is: how do we know that these person is genuine in testimony and not paid by CIA?

Of course not all news from CNN and BBC is a lie, but you should know that Xinjiang is the issue that western wont waste in order to decimate China, after tian an men, Huawei, etc. You know, even about Papua they probably lie eventhough they dont have heavy political agenda regarding Indonesia.

Dont believe western propaganda, they also talk something not right about Papua but we dont believe it since we know what they are telling about oppression on civil there is not correct.

You should, We dont want to guess what you are thinking.

What kind of violation?

Be a little bit smarter. "Based on" is not the same as "same", or means stuck on it forever :lol: Long March 2 is based on soyuz, but the level of advancement is different. Same like: Nasa rocket is based on Germany V-2, but the technological level is much different. Or same like J-16 is based...

Yeah I know ... sometimes some members can be fraud :laugh:

They dont use soyuz tech anymore. What they have is much much more advanced than that. Soyuz capability was so limited and still very manual, this one has more capability and fully digitized even AI supported.