Search results

One step closer to achieving economic goal.

You compare a vending machine to a whole shop. LOL

I'm sicken tired of your thick skull who obviously not at my level of deep thinking. LOL I SAID before that the carrier contract does not apply once a customer is boarded. It is a contract during the process of boarding, not BOARDED like in this case. This is unique in that way.

SOMETHING BIG IS GOING DOWN!! I'm sure our leadership will take all measures to defend ourselves.

Again, another stupid example misinterpret by you. I keep telling you to stick with the fact. When you "invite" him to your house, there is a CLEAR intend so what happens at your house at that point become your responsible. Therefore you cannot cite a irrelevant example of someone comes WITHOUT...

You don't get it, do you? If we are totally strictly on law basis rights, then everything has to be spell out in written so that both parties understand. In court, the judge will ask whether the captain or his flight crew spell out that rights in the contract so that the customer understand. If...

The news or the fact here is the crew member, in this case, I interpret as the flight attendant who demanded that he leave under the involuntary selection. The captain did NOT came out to demand to him to leave. But you said that the captain did and that was questionable. Like I said, beside...

Which news that said the captain demands he was to be remove?

Like I said, this is not a case of who has more authority in this case but a matter of contract dispute. The court will only intrepet what is written in the carrier contract. Also I don't remember in any news that say the captain pilot demand he needs to be remove. It was demand by the flight...

THat was a counter to his implied example that the guy was a thief. I said he was more of an invitee, so you can't call a police to arrest him at your house unless that invitee does something to cause a threat.

Under what federal rule or in the contract that give the captain absolute power to remove a paid customer on boarded the plane without justification?

Wrong again. Bad example: The person who breaks into your home is not a thief but an invitee to your house. Unless he posts a threat to your house, you cannot call the police. And two, he was not your local police but an aviation authority who work with the airline, so airlines do carry...

IT'snot overbooking and you cannot deny a pax once he/she is boarded the plane. Only under special circumstance under Rule 21 that you can remove him. None of those applied to the pax as he is not showing any threat or disruptive to the flight crew. Read that contract...

You are not thinking deeply enough, my friend. This is not a simple case. Let me address you. First of all, when UA call up an aviation authority, UA will become liable for all of his action, particularly if this happen inside the property of UA. An analogy for you to understand is if you call a...

I got bumped from a flight. Then I sued By Thatcher A. Stone Updated 12:21 AM ET, Wed April 12, 2017 [paste:font size="5"] won the case -- and $3,100 from Continental Airlines -- and I was on every major TV network. Then, as now, people were just fed up with the airlines, but if...

Again, he is just repeating what other legal experts have been stipulating that this is not a simple denied boarding case but refusual to transport. In refusal to transport contract case, you cannot forcibly remove a paid customer once they are on board and seat. Here is one law expert who read...

@gambit, you ask me what legal UA are wrong, here read it. United’s Removal Of Passengers May Not Have Been Legal APRIL 11, 2017 BY LUCKY99 COMMENTS 60 In light of Sunday night’s incident on a United flight between Chicago and Louisville, an interesting discussion is starting to emerge about...

The question is not whether United have the rights to drop some pax off the plane. The question is whether they have the legal rights to use force, in this case, dragging a paid customer off their plane without going through all the options. In court if this goes further, the first thing a judge...

That is equivalent of putting a bullet into his heart. :rofl:

LOL Any time when I heard of these "alliance" proposal that include the USA, I just think it is nothing more than a bunch of puppets seeking a sugar daddy. There is no such things as equal alliance when the US is involved. Everyone knows they will call the shot and this is why India elite is...