Search results

Wow..And we were stupid to later lose a 1000 of our own men and to beat the very Tamils?

And Pakistan never has this colonial mentality because no European ever ruled the land that is now called Pakistan? Post some logic for once, man.

This is such a wedding favorite.

Lol..that is such a brainless statement...

I don't see it happening around me. Although its a very small sample size, but when I see the kids of the laborers near my home roam around the place all day, I shudder to think the way things would be in rural areas. Are we even able to build schools in the jungles of the Naxal affected areas...

I seriously doubt these figures.

A mighty risk, I must say. When it comes to money, men know no Gods. Only time will tell how well it works out.

'Turk/Turkish' is a very broad ethno-linguistic classification. People right from Turkey to Mongolia and Uzbeks, Kyrghyz, Hazaras, Uighurs would be classified under the group. But to answer your question, based on historical and depictions, Genghis Khan was most probably from Mongolia.

From what I know. Huns and Mongols were related. Both spoke a Turkic language and were Turkic/Mongoloid in appearance. Apart from that, their battle tactics were very similar. And historical accounts mention that Huns originated from East of the Volga, not necessarily 'near Volga'...

Not again......

You're right. That was a cynical post. Deleted.

Bengal is the birth-place of the Naxal movement and Bengalis are one of the staunchest supporters of communism (although things are changing very fast). Why that is so is a tough question...!

The ones that were made up by your own newspapers? :rofl:

I am sorry I cant respond back in kind. There isn't enough bandwidth for me to list all the incidents. But the point is that a lot many Sikhs in the west were persecuted, some even lost their lives after 9/11. It was mainly due to ignorance on the part of the perpetrators but the fact that...

Deleted. Not required.

Wrong neither of them are what you describe. Look at the St.George's cross on the infantryman and the Mughal cavalrymen didn't carry curved bows and arrows. Thats a very peculiar Mongol/Hun way of warfare.

I dont understand the purpose of this thread. To show that Mongols are weak, do not have a powerful military and should be taken over by China? What do we have here? 14 year old kids playing strategy games?

post deleted

Hi Asim, I was wondering of we could create a sticky thread for Khalistan in the India defense section. There are a lot of different threads on the issue and it would be easier to have an effective and fruitful debate if every new article/news is limited to one thread. I have provided the links...

Thanks. I will do that.:)