Search results

PCA is an International arbitration court for international agreement, which you go to appeal if you think the ruling of any agreement is wrong. And PCA jurisdiction include UNCLOS appeal. PCA is not a part of UN because it need to maintain its impartiality. And also, under UNCLOS rules...

First of all, do you understand why Chinese claim was rejected by UNCLOS in 2013? Taiping Island or Itu Aba was ruled as a rock formation by PCS in 2016 after China and Taiwan protest. A rock formation is an isolation of rock cluster that did not connect to any continental shelf, which do not...

You cannot claim if that island is man made or not connected to continental shelf of your land limit (ie connected under water). Which is the argue point of the law, and which is why UNCLOS rule against China in 2013

Both are illegal. You cannot reclaim EEZ as per international law. You can reclaim up to12 nautical mile from your land, which is the limit of your territorial water

Actually no, according to International law, Owning an exclusive economic zone only give you the right of exploring and benefiting from economic activities. EEZ does not grant territorial right for the country that owns it, and cannot be obstructed with international shipping. And Reclamation is...

I am having problem people (Regardless of their gender or race or nationality) not respecting law and making excuse of breaking law. You can buy properties in Australia or anywhere, as long as you do it within the legal requirement, if you do that, I have no problem with you.

You don't know what does it mean by "Non-Resident" Non-Resident is anything other than Citizens, Permanent Resident and Legal Temporary Resident, of course Permanent Resident have to have identification, because it give you work right in Australia. By the way, if you are a permanent resident...

First of all, I did not say all Chinese purchase are "Fraud" there are some case where there is defrauding involved (which you actually quote the link to, where that 300 owner was forced to sell the house) when a Chinese owner buy a house using a Australian resident shill, which fraud will be...

Again, you can pay the fine for speeding, does that mean speeding is still in the legal framework? You, along with hundred of thousand of Chinese have a different concept of "Breaking the law" and this is where I have problem with. Just because you can pay the fine, does not mean what you are...

So, during 1 child policy, if parent want to have 2 child and can pay the fine to have them, how do you rectify the problem? You killed the second child once it is born? Nope...You let them keep the second child and fine them. But does that mean having a second child is legal in China during...

Did you bother to read my post in whole? So it is not "Breaking the law" or "It's Legal" if you can afford the fine? What kind of logic is this? So yes, as per my previous example, Speeding is legal as long as you pay the fine, is it correct? This is not a loophole, it is a law, you break...

It is not "Half Way Legal" nor Grey Area. That is not what I meant. It's a summery offence, ie not a CAN offence, like a Speeding or Parking ticket, only the fine is not $200, more like $135,000, that's quite easily afford by the Chinese buyer Nobody in the western world will jail people...

It's actually illegal in Australia, it's not "go-to-jail" illegal, but it is illegal nonetheless, if you want to buy a home in Australia, you need to be an Australian Permanent Resident. That does not stop the Chinese buyer who have none connection to Australia, to buy homes in Australia. If a...

Well, if you really want me to say how nature heal itself? Okay, then we all have to die, because we are the number one enemy on nature. With human population, we defer and inhabit the nature ability to heal itself. And because we don't want to live in a world where we put nature before us...

Well, since this is not a court of law, I am not going to keep comment on this, as I have no interest on the person. But you do know what you said is just a statement, it's your opinion, not a fact, right? Which mean what you said is just what you think, and if you think that's good enough for...

The thing that we all knew and pretend not to?

I think this post is going to be remove soon...…..You should know these type of discussion is not allowed here.

That is not what I say at all. The same things applies, just because he is a troll or racist, that does not mean he is not speaking of truth, because that would determined by what he said and not what he is. It's like in court, you cannot argue a witness statement because he is a troll or...

Don't forget during the SARS epidemic, people who report that early in China was disappeared, and all is right, only when it spread to other country (and in Hong Kong) the Chinese government then admit there are something wrong.

The problem is, being racist and being wrong on what he said is two completely different concept. He can be racist and he can still tell the truth. So, using this argument is not valid to counter his point.