Search results

The design is a 'flying wing' but the span, or dimension, is not the point. The shape is the point, not the size. :enjoy: So when will the world's militaries change to their models? That is because they cannot afford it. A missile is a throwaway weapon platform. An airplane is not. But not...

Wingspan? It is not the wingspan that affects radar cross section (RCS). It is the SHAPE. :lol: No. You just got lucky. The bottom line is that you are in no position intellectually to discuss the technical issues of the flying wing itself in particular and of low radar observability in...

Because the shape is excellent for low radar observability. The flying wing have been experimented with long before Nazi Germany came to be. The Nazis did not 'ditched' their experiments with the flying wing but were essentially stopped because of the end of WW II. Not because of the shape's...

Yah...That, he is. And I will demonstrate.

And Chinese avionics.

You guys did not know that China 'invented' satellite assisted navigation?

You have the wrong understanding of history, young one. Either that or you been reading the wrong books. Approved by the Party, perhaps? Historically speaking, the government have been the best exploiter and abuser of the people. Bar none. There can be no elites unless and until the government...

That is because he knew a 'heart attack' was coming. It seems cardiac related issues are common once joined the Party.

Not with 'Chinese physics'.

For decades, it has been the Chinese who wants to be like Americans. Our PDF Chinese are on a mission, at least on this little corner of the internet, to change that.

No, I do not. There is a difference between 'debate' and 'discussion'. In a 'debate', everyone focuses on the differences. Each side fight to win. A 'debate' is contestant. In a 'discussion', everyone focuses on the commonalities. All parties work to de-emphasize their differences and see if...

I think you have a misunderstanding of the concept of 'human shield'. Am going to use as neutral language as much as possible, and if I use 'you', I mean the word in the generic, not personal, sense. Let us see if whoever is behind the forum handle 'khansaheeb' is capable of the same courtesy...

There are now two aircraft carriers with potentially 10,000 sailors for Iran to humiliate. :enjoy:

If they were used that way... Every Western formal military, meaning the ones that have uniforms, know that if they ever have the deploy to the ME for any reason, they should expect the Muslim army to use human shield. This quiet understanding go back to before the internet, and I understand...

The difference between me and the rest of you is that at one point in my life, I actually served. Whereas with people like you, safe behind a firewall and keyboard, talking about how countries 'should' do this and that, it is YOU who are the true coward.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_Winnie-the-Pooh_in_China

I highly recommend: The Millionaire Next Door. https://www.amazon.com/Millionaire-Next-Door-Surprising-Americas/dp/1589795474 Once, I lived within walking distance of three millionaires and did not know they were. Their houses were larger than most in the neighborhood, but nothing extravagant...

Warped? When I received orders to deploy to Desert Storm, our squadron had a briefing where we should expect the Iraqi Army to use human shields. I doubt that you understood the gist of my comment to start. :rolleyes:

Your government banned bear cartoons. :lol:

Yes, you have 10,000 sailors potentially in the same humiliating postures. Would Iran want to try? :enjoy: