Search results

Sorry, sweetheart. You are nothing but a mindless drone reading whatever a Party flack put in front of you. Go back to being an eye-candy to the millions of Chinese men without women in their future. :lol:

The harsh reality is that Russia does not need China's weapons. The failure of the VKS proved that. The VKS should have dominated Ukrainian sky within 3 days, 5 max. China's weapons were pointless then, and now. Mr. Han Pastry does not know WTF he was talking about.

Or that he finally got his China social credit score and lost it.

That is hilarious. And it begs the question: Why not? If it is so certain that if China supply weapons to Russia, the war would be done by now, then why not have China done it? It would have been beneficial for Russia and China to have the war over quick, no? But the fact that your China done...

This is where you are wrong, but understandable that you would be wrong because you do not know anything about firearms in the first place. I have used such targets before and do not see race. I see the outline of a man, and usually the 'bad guy' is male, and what he would often appears to be...

Yeah...If there is a male target with Asian features, you would be crying racism. :rolleyes:

The Eisenhower is moving into the area. Now Iran has two US aircraft carriers to take over. :lol:

So China's support is virtual, not physical.

The question revealed your failure to understand the nature of the conflict. No surprise there considering you never served and never had any form of military education. Hamas is the organization fighting. The Palestinians is the greater group, a population that Hamas is hiding behind. China...

So China is sending bandages.

Considering tens of thousands of Chinese handling the reality of American life so well that they have been here for yrs, who else can Zhanyuan Yang blame?

So you said the 'why', but now where is the 'how'?

Yes, Hamas boycotted Western made cell phones...OOooohhhh...Aaaahhhh...Boycott success...!!! :lol:

Yaahhh...I forgot that one...Thnx...:enjoy:

Of course not. We do not want to. We want to give people choices even if some want to boycott. But in this case, looks like your call for boycott is a DUD. :lol:

To him and others like him who cheers for Russia, items 1- 4 constitutes a victory. But of course, they will always fall back on the 'not yet total warfare' nonsense.

Ban? No, YOU were the one advocating boycott. A 'boycott' is a decision to not use what is available. Not refusal to sell. Now we know you do not understand the meaning of 'boycott'. :enjoy:

Aaahhh...So now you are straining at the 'manufacture' argument. :lol: Intellectually speaking, where did POWERED flight originated? Try to stay within real physics, not 'Chinese physics' like so many of you guys often done in the past.

You do not want to 'sustain' a war. By that argument, Russia lost. The military do not produce but destroy. That is its nature. Same for a war. Wars consume things and people -- in an instant. A bomb destroys a car or kill a human being. Then it will take literally yrs to make a new car and...

Stop using 'Western' products? The non-West would collapse. Simple as that. Stop using 'Western' products? How does one, for one's self, make that determination? How many degrees of separation between the item and its INTELLECTUAL origin? If the microwave oven was physically assembled in an...