Search results

Correct. It is a load bearing vest meant for distributing weight to be better able to carry ammunition and other supplies. I do not know if they have kevlar to help to protect against fragmentation injuries.

I have seen no proof indicating they are SSG. They might be Brit Pakistani for all I know.

That's not an SSG picture, right?

I really hope that's not a new camo. It didn't work for the US Army and it won't work for Pak Army.

What duplicity was exposed and with what evidence? Fair is irrelevant. Petraeus knows a lot more than Fair ever will.

They're not bullet proof vests. They are load bearing vests and they don't grow on trees. We are a poor country and not everything will ever be standardized in cammo for each service.

They were Spetsnaz. It just means Special forces in Russian. These were Airborne Spetsnaz.

Then I don't think you fully understand infantry cammo and its purpose. It's not so much to hide. It's too make acquisition difficult and slow for the enemy by confusing their senses at long distances. They aren't snipers. Most militaries still use black colored guns for this reason.

You really have no idea what an insurgency is do you? Entire armies with more resources than Pakistan have been defeated before due to the same cocky attitude. Learn history please. Well said. Some people here think, you can aim a shot at enemy forces a mile away using an assault rifle with no...

Strange how this brilliant ISI operation is not getting more credit.

That's either FC or ISI.

Why would anyone do that and give legitimacy to some stupid website?

No. This isn't a bodybuilding competition. They are built for stamina, tactics and independent thinking. That's what leads to special forces success. They won't be showing off their bodies or lifting weights during an operation.

I don't think you understand the purpose of a QRF. The QRF model has been a huge success. It has standardized operating procedures for army teams that are ready to move out in a moment's notice and are trained for close quarter combat. You are not using the right parameters of success and...

Context of this picture? Where was this taken? What vehicle is that? What SAM?

Why do you doubt it? PAA has been impressed with the Z-10.

No helmets?

It's not the same wing shape. It looks different but the picture is too low res to be sure.

The root of the problem is deeper then FATA

What unit is this?