Hmmm I have a book on the Royal Navy that stated otherwise specifically mentioning the aluminium structure as being a fire risk.
But thanks for the correction.
Perhaps I should have been more clear about taken out.
Iraqi infantrymen scored a mobility kill against an Abram by hitting it in the rear armour. As I have mentioned its a matter of probabality I doubt many infanteers could even get close to a tanks rear armour to score a kill on it...
Tank armour is distributed around the vehicle as it is a forward fighting rather like a man armed with a shield.
The thickest armour is on the front and it is thinnest at the rear.
If the entire tank had equally distributed armour an M1 Abrams would weigh 200 tonnes or so.
This is the...
It wieghs about 30 tonnes so when compared to say a Pakistani M113 this thing is quite well protected and waaaay better than a BMP2 though a BMP3 could be comaparable.
This particular example was hit by a hellfire missile in Baghdad killing quite a few civilians I recall the controversy of...
Guerilla war country is where tanks are most vulnerable to anti armour weapons.
They need to be deployed and backed up with infantry units to flush out terrorist anti tank teams.
Plus given the look of the armour and road wheels I'm guesiing that is an Al Zarrar.
Batmannow I think a better model would be the UKs Special Forces Support Group.
This consists of personnel from units like the Parachute Regiment, Royal Marines and RAF Regiment.
They provide infantry type support to units like the SAS and SBS and can be considered an Elite unit more so...