Search results

I don't have access to the report or participated in the investigation so I cannot give you a definitive answer. But according the the available published material is that the main focus pointing the finger to the North was the markings on the torpedo. Now, there are many people having...

You misunderstood me, I said the results of the Independent investigations points to the North, it does not mean that is the final answer.

That's why the investigation results cannot be taken as the final answer. Hence, there is no concrete action apart from condemnation and referring the issue to the UNSC. This is where the ambiguity is, so if the North openly admits. Then this would remove everything in regards to the results...

No one can be sure who is responsible although the Independent Investigations points to North Korea. The Dear Leader however, denies responsibility. My point being due to this "I say it is you, and you say I am not responsible" would not actually go anywhere, let alone some concrete action...

I know that China would get involved if there is a conflict. But you need to understand this is not by their will, China would be dragged into it. If the North openly admit responsibility for the sinking of the Cheonan, then there would be no reason for China to support the North unless China...

That is because Iran is a superpower. :usflag:

There should be a permanent member from the African continent. South Africa is a good candidate.

The problem with that is when you include a region, especially the EU, they are not united. Each member state would act according to their own interests. One voice, cannot represent every member.

I also believe the North would not start anything, because they know very well it would be their end. The North would be a good proxy for China, but not good enough to go to war for.

The Dear Leader is famous to have the balls to do things where no leader would. Tell the Dear Leader to go on public TV, broadcasting to the world that they sank the Cheonan. Then see what happens. :) :usflag:

Even if India succeed, it would be without Veto power, the 5Ps would not want to dilute their prestigious power.

It depends what the Casus Belli is, if the North provokes and starts the war, then there would be no reason for China to support them, at least openly. The World would be behind us in stopping North Korea. China, with her economic engine running at full speed and projecting an image of a...

China is not buying enough of their toys. :)

If you believe everything is propaganda and everything was for oil, then so be it, it is your right. As to why we started the WOT you can check the casus belli, I thought the reasons are clear. When you train someone, do you guarantee that they would never turn on you in their lifetime?. 9/11...

I understand what your trying to say, but there are different views which can be debatable. Just like, what do you call a glass of water filled to the midline?. Half empty or half full?.

Taiwan can't save anyone, not even themselves. Taiwan is not in a position to wage conflicts.

I really don't understand why you guys keep trumpeting the wipe out of specific countries. :what:

Why you say the J-10 is junk? can you elaborate?. Is the Tejas better?.

That is what I mean, the thing slowing us down in Afghanistan is the factor of civilians. If we take out that factor, the bunnies would fall. Hence I used the deserted island example to prove my point. No not really, the measure of damage, how do you measure and according to what standards...

The reason I said big and long was in reference to the diagram. However, some people got excited about it. :agree: