Pakistani members are alright with being lied to I guess. In another thread they were claiming that Kargil lies were alright because of operational necessity. What's that they say about fool me once..
How can you accept official positions of both countries when they contradict each other? One side has to be lying. We've reached a gridlock, brah no sense in talking further on this topic. Will make note few years from now when truth is out in the open from your side to come back and point it...
Doesn't add up again mate. Your side is already retaliating even for civilian deaths. Assuming cowardice, why wouldn't guns fall silent on Indian side? Patriotism is good but blind patriotism is unhealthy. So far in our exchange, you are the one parroting your side's line like a good citizen. I...
Come on bruv, how are they not dying NOW? Indian Army is firing on your posts and claiming all these kills, Pakistan side is completely silent or denying. Admit some cover up is going on, if you have any sense of fairness in you. Look at how I was able to make a neutral comment on the surgical...
I'm not the kind of person to buy BS from Indian or Pakistani side specially having grown up in America. India claimed surgical strikes, onus is on them to prove them to the world. However, Indian media did some investigation on their own and even some neutral sources on your side said that...
The people you were fighting against were at war for multiple decades some since the Soviet invasion. That means that their bomb proof and mortar proof abilities were MUCHO battle hardened compared to your troops. Firr kaise haar gaye? :p:
All this proves is that information is freely coming from one side and completely missing from one side. Any sane Pakistani's bullshit alarm should be going off with respect to what they are being force fed by their propaganda machine. Wait 2-3 years when suddenly 20 people get awarded...
Did they attack with mortar fire and artillery fire though? Battle hardening fauji ko mortar proof ker deti hai kya? :P If TTP attacked with thousands of men, that tells me it was a very different battle than is fought in Kashmir where even in Kargil conflict thousands of men were not involved...
Is that a joke? India's been fighting insurgencies not only in Kashmir but in Punjab and other parts of India for decades. How does battle hardening protect against mortar shells and artillery btw?
Oh totally agree, I think we should give an opportunity to the hostile population to migrate to Pakistan who can then make their Kashmir independent if they want. If Sikhs and Hindus had to migrate over in 1947, Kashmiris aren't a special snowflake, land stays with India.
If I'm reading correctly, there would be a one year recession followed by making up for lost growth over a decade. India's GDP is diverse so it would recover. If India could target CPEC projects during the war, good luck to Pakistan for recovering. Your post basically reaffirms my point - war...
How is a war defined then? :) In America, we were taught in school that all Indian Pakistan wars were skirmishes. Well, getting semantics out of the way, I was calling it a war.
Alright, so I did the math. Kargil cost 5000 crore INR in 1999 and in today's dollars assuming 10% inflation it works...
The cost of getting the second half is too high, it would screw the economy over and get a lot of people killed. It's not worth it, that was the point of Pakistan's nuclear tests. Doesn't mean we can't do it though.