Search results

I hope so, But I like (and I really like) HEU PWR Reactor, maybe joint R&D with Britain or US.

If EMALS going in IAC-2, then so is DAE developed LEU PWR Reactor.

I think there is lot of confusion about the LCA R&D program in foreign countries. Including about LCA MK. 1A & 2.

But only by 1996, the program actually able to get proper funding. And first flight of Technology Demonstrator, not Prototype, able to fly in 2001. Prototype not able to fly until 2003. I dont know how you calculated 30 years.

Because it is designed by the NDB & reactor by the DAE. Maybe, EMALS come from the US. Now understood?

The China bought the Carrier in 1998, so why only by 2012 it able to go for sea trials? Amazing China also need 15 years to revamp (not build) a carrier? :rofl: Which truth, that till this time the Pakistan not able to develop PHWR reactor, leave alone PWR?

MF-STAR

Nothing disclosed, real work always done in TACDE by IAF's pilots.

No Baniya is not a racist term, actually Baniyas are pretty proud people that they are Baniyas & about there businesses. Like Gupta, Agrawal. Maybe this is not the right thread to describe further.

This means nothing The IAF do maneuvers testing in this configuration, which really matters.

You not provided any pic, not any video, just statement. And now you expecting me to believe? Nope bro, watch the program of Pakistanis jurnos. Yes it is, GPS is general term, Global Positioning Satellites/System. And NAVSTAR is not reconnaissance SAT, that used for IMINT. This was very...

So your statement is proof? Good. If deployed, then show atleast a pic, and please of JF-17 in PAF colors, not FC-1. Facepalm, atleast use the right term that is NavStar. It is because there is none. Maybe you know the difference between Displayed, Tested & Deployed.

How you can prove this, even during current programs by Pakistanis Jurnos reporting PAF base, this clearly shown the JF-17 even doing combat sorties in waziristan without targeting pod. Because only after that I consider your argument as authentic. Otherwise your argument is Null & Void. It...

By the same argument, can we consider this Astra already integrated with LCA? Never displayed. Will you show me video or anything else, when JF-17 dropping LGB equipped with Laser Targeting Pod. BTW, LGB can be dropped even without targeting pod by using forward air controller.

Indeed true. And Saab doing everything to kill LCA Mk.2. Do you have? For starters, show me a pic in PAF colors JF-17 equipped & flying with WMD-7 pod.

But Teja isnt a failed project in your terms? So against it performing exceptionally well? Seems like pretty decent job.:lol:

Which light weight fighter? Name them? Or you forgotten the name?

I know, but after all they are OEM, and contracts going to sign with them. So, why PAF representing, not PAC Kamra? Or this is the case they become OEM without even hiring a single test pilot or prototype in there custody?:lol:

And still without no targeting pod. :rofl:

Where I said Tejas? Or are you comparing with LCA which in your case consider as failed project? If it performed exceptionally well against a failed jet, then its pretty good.