No no, of RAW.
As these are involvements of RAW, not of India.
BTW, any one asked why they calling it as dossier when it only contain narrative and not proofs? Why not they calling "RAW Charit Manas"?:rofl:
Will you name 26 consulates? I want to here.
Any Proof?
SL is sovereign territory of Pakistqan? I dont know that.
You are definitely blind.
It doing so since 1947.
Yup it is, but not shown by MoD chart.
Maybe you have some higher enlightenment that no one in MoD, ADA & DRDO able to see. Or maybe NIC sites are wrong.
Actually people dont understand legality behind this,
they think if a same person heading both ORG, then these are same.
Well, well, well. People are here busy to prove that the information provided by the NIC & GOV sites are fake.
Where is referring as same? Maybe you assuming many things.
I checked it several times before sticking to this point.
If so, then why not ADA write " An autonomous organization under DRDO"?
I am circling? Seriously? This was your link. And you that misunderstood DDR&D as DRDO, not me.
And why you asking me? OR
You vowed not to open any site of MoD or ADA or DRDO where clearly describing functioning of Department of Defence Research & Development ? Or you trying to prove sites...
Where it said so? And if there is no organization like this then why it described in both DRDO ( who is under DDR&D), and in MoD site, just for fun?
And for god sake open the ADA site, or check there printed advertisements, you will know whom they are under, and they are answerable to who...