Search results

The similar design also meant for LCA Mk.1A

The ultimate choice for the cockpit, and IAF should demand is this

PAF not even able to equip BLK-1 &BLK-2 with WMD-7 Targeting pod. Blk-3 not going to be more potent than LCA MK1 IOC, leave alone Mk.1A & MK.2 which also meant to equipped with IRST. But yes MFDs in cockpit of JF-17 is much much better than LCA.

As retractable refueling pod. El/M-2052 & EL/L-8222 in LCA Mk.1A and in Darin 3 program, Muhib e Watan e Pakistanis should concern this. Retractable refueling pod in Jaguar.

LCA Mk.1A also meant to replace MiG-27. AMCA meant to replace MiG-29 & Mirage

Nostalgia, :lol: It always fun to read old threads.

This is bad idea, I actually propose to design a light frigate based on Kamotra for BD equipped with Klub & Barak-1.

I died from laugh when I read war on terror. War on terror on your own funkin sovereign land? :rofl:

Lol, Zarb e Azb is LIC, not COIN. Pak Army still not adopted COIN. We all know how much civil administration exist in SWAT. The Governor of KPK automatically become governor of FATA. Hilarious. Its been 6 years, still no reforms? Yeah, like India automatically become governable? On borders...

And I think 1 more deal going to sign, developing a SSN for Indian Navy. AEW aircrafts (not heli) is must in next gen ACC

Sorry, I never claimed I am expert in COIN. You even know meaning of COIN operation, local intelligence, creating civil authorities? There is any local/civil administration in SWAT valley which was captured in 2009? High grounds tactics use in Conventional warfare, not in establishing...

She? :/ Like the Pak Army as whole? Who even not prepared for Low Intensity Conflicts, and now using Type 59 for direct fire assault on ridge-lines in Shawal? The intended Operation was COIN, and now they converted this into conventional warfare, sitting on heights for tactical advantage...

FFS, what is breaking news in it? BTW, another thread already running on this topic.

In that case, every one can shootdown supersonic AShM, even CIWS. BTW, Aster is dual stage missile, while Barak is dual stage dual pulse missile.

Nope, it is not. It was designed to deal with naval BMD, and high altitude aircrafts. Aster & Barak are 180 degree apart from there roles.

Dual seekers.

All frontline ships? Thats overstatement. It is, because BrahMos test data was shared with IAI, but no test is conducted until now against supersonic AShM.

Why not picking a plane from every country, and buying them? Add F-15, F-22, F-35,F/A-18 and SU-35, SU-34. And if offered we also buy the J-11, J-10. Buying 36 each of them.

Again, like your conclusion matters most, and CAG's conclusions are nothing. You are are absolutely right, One suggestion, why you making mockery of themselves by giving proofs of discussion, instead hard facts on which CAG report is based? Or you enlightened with extreme knowledge, which CAG...

:D:lol: