Search results

How the hell ISRO comparable to whatever you have linked to? It seems like a Chinese twitch.tv

Does China have a controlling interest in AIIB? No Hence, AIIB is not China’s bank. Hence this news is false. “China led” is a meaningless weasel phrase which can be interpreted as anything. Rest of your post is a rant. So I ignore it.

Social media news? I challenge you to point one place where I have linked to any social media. My sources are ISRO and Brahmos’s press release. BTW I have not seen a single source from you of all you hypersonic claims,

False article and false claim. China does not own AIIB. It is not the majority vote holder. It is largest but less than 50% vote holder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asian_Infrastructure_Investment_Bank#Shareholding_structure China is the largest share holder of AIIB BUT it is not the majority share holder. There is no majority share holder in the bank. China's share vote % is 30%. Rest of the article is bogus since the basic...

No dear, I am saying that material problem has been solved long back because that problem was faced by something else as well. BTW, for all your "hypersonic material" hype, I am yet to see a single source. Asserting and not giving any source is worse. Its called ignorance. Link to what you call...

If you want to go in that tangent, well, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor_count#Transistor_density There is feature size and there is transistor density. Intel at 10 nm was having better transistor density than say Samsung and TSMC 7 and 8 nm processes. Intel's next 5nm shrink will...

Its not the reasons, its the "limitations" of hypersonic cruise missiles that you raised. Those *should* be universal because they seem to be rooted in "physics". Unless of course you are suggesting there are different laws of physics in different countries. Curiously, since you have mentioned...

Do remember these "observation" or rather speculations are not India specific. Hypersonic cruise missile have been studied and are being developed by three of the P5s. I think they might have done their homework on it. Curiously, why it has to be "either or"?

India has tested a reusable return vehicle : https://www.isro.gov.in/technology-development-programmes/reusable-launch-vehicle-technology-demonstration-program-rlv-td India already has a terminal guidance for Brahmos ...

China also does not have a working hypersonic cruise missile. Only Russia has. Actually, India took more than 10 years to get to this stage in SCRAMjet based hypersonic tech. Tech demonstrator project dates back to 2008-2010. Good thing is that it now has required infra (wind tunnels) and...

Excuses excuses and more excuses. Pakistan ruled East Pakistan for more than 25 years. If that was not enough to build enough defences then sorry dear, all you said is just that : excuses. BTW, even in west Pakistan, Pakistan lost half its navy in 71. Karachi port suffered massive damages by...

Yes, and no. Existing anti-missile systems cann't handle fractional orbital bombardment type of threats. Heck, even MIRV are very very very hard to defend against. When it comes to strategic ballistic missiles, even now, there is no effective defence. Ask Pakistanis, why they went for MIRV. All...

Well, as long as Indian Army can produce 71 type results, I think India will be satisfied too. Makes both of us happy, right? You keep Feb 27, we will keep 71.

It was not. This was ongoing since 2008 or so.

Well, when Pakistan uses unproven and overhyped Chinese weapons then India is doing much better with israeli tech.

They have. Its called Starry Sky 2. https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy-defence/article/2158524/chinas-hypersonic-aircraft-starry-sky-2-could-be-used

You do know that SCRAMjet powered air breathing vehicle / missile will not leave the atmosphere, right? Why do you need "space reconnaissance system" then? You do know that any nation fielding any kind of re-entry vehicles will have access to heat resistant materials. Infact, re-entry velocity...

\ ISRO tested SCRAMjet powered by hydrogen. DRDO tested SCRAMjet powered by kerosene. It is similar to what NASA and Boeing did. NASA's X43 was foundation of Boeing Waverider,

Nope, there is no evidence that system was jammed. Infact that place was quite far off. What got jammed were Mig and Sukhoi's communication systems. Infact, had that system jammed, it would have missed. It did not. Besides, Barak 8 is a totally different system from SPYDER. Why are you even...