Search results

In Pakistan, does respecting Islam comes at a cost of withdrawing respect from others? Well, yes it does. When Islam clashes with other religion in Pakistan, Islam wins. Hence, in India same should have to Islam and Christianity wrt Hinduism, Sikhi, Buddhism. Fullstop.

Irrelevant.

So let me see, you are discussing me rather than topic. Eh, nice Ad Hominem.

Again, why do India even matter. What is its significance in this discussion?

Why does Kashmir matter? Is it in US? Nope! Then why are you posting it in this thread?

Why do India even matter?

Who cares about India and why does it matter in this thread?

Who the hell are you to judge who is a bigot? Kashmir does not matter in this discussion.

China does that. Almost always. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/14/china-must-stop-forcing-us-firms-share-intellectual-property-peter-navarro-column/563151001/

but what if your enemy's enemy also turns out to be your enemy! So you now have an enemy with an enemy who is also an enemy.

In East Pakistan, Hindus were decimated. Why is it that Muslims are still flourishing in India? The only way forward for India is to ensure that there is no representation of non-native religions in Indian polity and administration. Absolutely none.

Indeed, yes. Somethings cannot be compromised. Protecting Hindus and hinduism should be the number one priority of the state of India. The moment one leaves hinduism he leaves all protection and all privileges. India still needs to cleanse its bureaucracy and its constitution of all the 70...

And then you woke up because you had fallen from your cot.

Or we can do much simpler way. If you convert to Christianity or Islam, you loose your right to vote. Simple. Well, Pakistan now is a bastion for Muslims of the subcontinent and they are safe there. Hindus are extremely vulnerable in India. Hindus need a homeland, the one that was stolen from...

Hillarious! No, the world over when people say "Hypersonic Weapons" they mean HGV or Hypersonic Cruise Missiles. Had the definition of Hypersonic weapon being "one with flies over mach 5" then both Iran and North Korea have hypersonic weapons. For quite sometime actually :lol: Ballistic...

I said nothing about PAF.

A hypersonic glide weapon is not same as Hypersonic cruise missiles and NONE of them are same as a ballistic re-entry vehicle. Flying at hypersonic speed is not enough to be a HGV or a Hypersonic Cruise Missile. And that does not help one to get any of these technologies.

Oh? https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/08/14/china-must-stop-forcing-us-firms-share-intellectual-property-peter-navarro-column/563151001/ https://globalnews.ca/news/7275588/inside-the-chinese-military-attack-on-nortel/ Also wikipedia is not even a source.

Let me put it in this way, right now even China cann't built the scramjet based missile. because its under research everywhere. So forget it. BTW, you have not built MIRV, the RV part of MIRV is simply not there. Also, JF-17 is purely a Chinese plane. So each time a new block comes, it is...

You dont have a hypersonic missile just for having one. There is a rhyme and a reason behind it. SCRAMjet ones make a good anti ship missile. HGVs make ICBMs hard to detect early. None of them are a use for Pakistan : Its geographically too close to India to even require a HGV and naval conflict...