4 out of 7 presidents/PMs/presiding military generals of United Pakistan from 1947 to 1971 were Bengali. population wise, East Pakistanis formed the majority of Pakistanis. who ruled who?
because the East Pakistani people before 1947 weren't actually supporting their emancipation as East...
a dirty little BAL neo Hitler finally expressing himself. this 'Shahbaghi' extremism is to Bangladesh society what Black Death was to 14th century Europe or what the atom bomb was to Hiroshima.
you should change both your flags if you are against the creation of East Pakistan.
your Bengali Hindu supremacism is been rejected by peace loving Hindus and Muslims. only place for it is Indian ocean. Bangladesh will cleanse itself of the Bengali Hindu supremacist "national anthem" and all...
whatever. the mother of all terror is the Muslimphobic anti-theist terror Awami League has been carrying out for a long time. Pakistan probably has no parallel for that.
Because Bangladeshi people are too weak to stand up to the communist fascist Hasina regime.
Thanks to those Pakistanis who showed their support for the Bangladesh people facing terror from Hasina regime every day.
everyone who opposed Indian proxy operation and 1971 invasion of East Pakistan...
no i don't think everything was okay before 1971. what i'm saying is it could have been even worse than it actually was, and it would still not justify the Indian takeover of East Pakistan and India installing a loyal regime and system oppressing the people of that land.
things like anti-Urdu...
good point. this is the exact line Hindus were trying to sell to East Pakistan Muslims all along. motive: to bring East Pakistanis back into Hindu domination. Awami League played on ethno-centrism. motive: to create political momentum/get votes and for the extremist elements, to de-Muslimize and...
if your definition of "actual Bangladeshis" is Indian paid agents, then you are right. they are appreciative that India provided help to carry out genocide on patriotic East Pakistanis and turn East Pakistan into a semi autonomous Indian colony.
opposition leaders are being hanged left and right. no one can question the Hindu-Brahmanic order of things set up since 1971. there is serious autocracy going on led by a group of seriously anti-Muslim people. what length do you want to go to to make sure state governance is not per Muslim values?
a separation based on mutual will between East and West Pakistan is one thing. this was annexation of one by India.
to be practical, people of East Bengal (particularly Muslims) by subcontinental standards were very backward by the year they got independence in 1947, after a long period of...
Awami League top leadership consisting of Tajuddins and Tufails and their (officially) communist cohorts were/are trained by RAW-KGB. they were wanting to take over East Pakistan with their dirty leftist and Hindu supremacist ideology for a very long time already. Sheikh Mujib was double minded...
all people who support or supported India's 1971 annexation of East Pakistan should apologize.
those are Indian agents. actual Bangladeshis grieve at the fact they came under Indian control and their very identity as East Pakistanis changed to 'Bangladeshi' and identity as sovereign...
although i used to have a different view on this, i actually agree. Awami League's later waging of war on it's own citizens and country to let India colonize it showed that United Pakistan military leadership was right in not handing over power to Sheikh Mujib that soon. how can you let a party...