Search results

If there is no occupation, what are they fighting against? Sorry blain2, but you have no argument whatsoever. Those people consider themselves to be under occupation, so they are fighting. However, you choose to colour their movement terrorist because it suits your interests.

Thank you blain2. I think I do know enough about Sharia, and I\'ll not mince my words. I find it disgusting, primitive, and a blot on the face of the 21st century. I\'d rather live under the Chinese communist party (atleast they are progressive) rather than under religious laws...

Simple. Stop supporting the separatists and jehadis, morally or materially. Declare the LOC as IB and be done with it. Say hello to peace and prosperity.

Utter nonsense. There is no excuse for supporting an Islamic insurgency. Jehadi apoligists like yourself should be ashamed of yourselves. You are no better than the Jehadis, because you tacitly (actually openly) support them. Yet, to you the Taliban are terrorists. How convenient...

My point is that Pakistanis are not indifferent to Indians, as you are claiming. They are infact extremely opinionated about everything related to India.

I\'m not in favour of that either. If recent news reports are to be believed, Jehadis are regularly criss-crossing Indian territory forming alliances from Assam to Kerala. We don\'t need to make their job any easier. Let them deal with the Jehadi problem, get some control over their...

I\'m sorry, but the love of bollywood movies on your side says the opposite. Pakistanis have been steeped in Indian movies, music and culture for the last 60 years, however, very little has come from your side of the border. Also, in a rather weird parallel, jehadi organizations have been...

^The security threat is too real in order to simply open the borders, irrespective of any \"soft-spots\" that people might have. The only people who IMO have a soft-spot for Pakistan are certain Punjabis and perhaps to some extent Delhiites. The rest of India has had little contact with...

Highly irresponsible statement, sir. How can you guarantee that they will never be able to implement their agenda? Is that the same complacent thinking that led to the loss of FATA and Swat to the Taliban forces?

Correct, but then it hasn\'t. So lets hold our horses before declaring war, shall we?

Sir, I think your post count is testimony to the fact that you know exactly what the agenda of organizations like LeT, HuM, etc. are. If you do not know, it is highly unfortunate, and perhaps I would like to point you to the relevant site : Lashkar-e-Taiba - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia...

Interesting. I wonder what would happen if the Indians took a similar view regarding the involvement of ISI in the Mumbai blasts and the preceding Kandahar blasts (which have now been confirmed by multiple and credible sources). Thankfully, Indian leadership is more responsible than that.

Indeed, diplo-speak aside, the locals know that they have lost, and the Pakistani state cannot help them any longer.

I\'m sure they will my friend. And I look forward to the day when you have to eat your words.

^I have responded, but you have chosen to avoid answering by calling it off-topic.

^The fact is that India is not supporting these movements, which are the creations of your own state. Believe it or not, they really are. So I suggest that you guys follow the news reports rather than manufacture conspiracy theories to somehow make India share the blame for whatever is...

^Sir I think you are being very dishonest. Your reasoning for supporting any jehadi organization is simply because they want to end Indian rule in Kashmir, and that they are supposedly \\\"too weak\\\" to implement any other agenda that they might have. The fact of the matter is that the...

Any news regarding the allegations of links to India?

Sir, even the Taliban claim to be fighting for freedom. Perhaps one should examine what exactly the aims of an organization are before professing support for them and declaring them \"noble\". The fact that these organizations want to implement a repressive regime is of utmost importance...

This AFP is American Free Press - an \"alternative\" newspaper that often runs stories of conspiracy theories. No relation with Agence France Presse. - the reputed wire service.