Search results

he is perfectly right.

celebs were used as examples because they are most visible e.g Amir Khan(boxer) is also quite famous he was there in vegas for 2nd May fight got lot of media attention etc etc similair for Kim kardashian(in case of armenia) but no amount of Indian celebs(probably most visible for a non...

Great

LOL Pakistan was more or less a geopolitical change in North West South Asia(even though it was a pan British India Muslim movement) for that cushion was always there for couple of centuries since abdali pushed marathas out. There is no room for such geopolitical/ethnic change in current india.

Its not just arabs I think some pashtuns also settled in in Hyderabad region, I have seen some people from these region they dont look like from local stocks atleast on average.

they are Levantine arabs like syrians/Lebanese.

^^ he is talking about leventine arabs I guess from syria/lebonan etc they are lighter skinned.

LOL talking about arabs when Hindukush is right at head of Pakistan, as I said before cline move down for there you cant lump central Asia with Middle east. Cental Asia is very important in genetics of South Asia as they are very closely linked specially NW South Asia e.g these are closest...

basically this is the case here genetic cline exactly follow geography from Hindukush to South India there is a cline, on first we have groups like Pashtun/Kalash than Punjab/Sindh after that rest of Indian states but there is not much difference b/w bihar/bengal and South India unlike more...

thats what I meant In pakistan's genetic case Central Asia is more relevant, the Caucasoid component itself peaks in Hindukush/Indus valley(in similar way it does in N Caucasus) and its genetic makeup is different from middle east.

Well different looks in pakistan have nothing to do with west Asian infusion/blend, scientifically the epicenter is very much in Pakistan in Hindukush , the closer you get to it lighter on average it is groups like Pashtun/Kalash/Hunza are closest Punjab/Sindh follows its simple geography.

Nice, that pic so cool

:lol: Indian geography combine with tough survival cycle(1.3 billion to sustain in cramped geography), energy hungry with energy routes in other nations etc doesnt allow it any hegemonic leverage heck no country in the region has that including china, It was only USA that was so influential...

when you have right wing and jingoistic urban middle class because of historical baggage such articles are produced to give confidence.

no every early civilization is around a river and so was IVC , it is not surprising that we have expansion toward Kabul river path a tributary of Indus, a civilization is defined by its main centers those discovered more toward east are small centers.

+1 South Indians are really nice people and carry no hate baggage against Pakistan.

There is a chance that IVC people might have assimilated Ganga landers and Southies(Peninsular Indians ) as slaves and cheap laborers so i think they can also have some claims.

majority of Indians are not decedents of IVC genetically people living b/w indus tributaries from Kabul to Sutlej(Eastern Afghnaistan to Indian Punjab) are closest,Pakistan covers the overwhelming demographic junk obviously you are not going to produce exact political map in a future scenarios...

being a developing country and joining a country with lot poor pop density and resource to pop ratio than yours nothing can get more stupid for Pakistan

Might turn out to be good move for some socioeconomic uplift but not tht excited about it, I would like them to be enrolled in uni across countries on subsidized rates we need high quality human capital more than anything else.