You may have read somewhere I previously posted on this thread, if committing to sending ISI in good faith was bad- you could not be more wrong. How did Balochistan find its way in to Sharm El Sheikh? MMS was sure he had a clean slate and nothing to hide.
The other part of the plot, to publicly...
Don't get too caught up with the way the world already functions. Get out of your mental cage. Since this is a forum, it makes sense to be discussing new ideas rather than plain old BS our leaders have been concocting over decades. If you want to stick around the old bush, why even have this...
If you want a global vote on K, you have my vote in the affirmative to your proposal. Lets go for it. Infact what you have proposed is the most balanced way to look at this conflict. Now before you shoot it down with any other localised example, you must see that at a very inefficient level this...
The only stakeholders are every1 whose a$$ is on the line. Clinton has famously said K is the most dangerous nuclear flashpoint on this planet. Couple that with your behavior on the LoC (Ceasefire violations to send in funduz) & you have a state that is banking on perhaps too much leverage from...
Batter! You got that right. It was not inadvertent, I have believed in democracy all along. I have also said it must involve ALL stake holders. That is every Indian , every Pakistani. I have been bold enough to propose even PIOs & PPOs be brought into the ambit of this poll. OK.
Now do the...
Give me reason, not rhetoric. I dont speak for India. The GoI does not give a f about what I think.
Given that bg, are not the billion+ in India & Pakistan, and the diaspora of India and Pakistan all stake holders in K? For that matter even PIOs and PPOs. Democracy is the best way forward...
AM. You will be accused of reverse flaming if you dont drop the 'lop sided' bit in any future references to this thread.
OK. Answering to the call of
There are many levels at which such a partnership has to work. Regional level of mutual concern, global issues of mutual concern, global issues...
It is. No US- No India, China, Pakistan, Afghanistanas we know them today. US is the engine behind China's rise first and now India's. "Commando" Musharraf war games against the US when they demand "with or against" & after much deliberation comes to a conclusion that partnering with the US on...
Ack! Let me set the record straight.
The evidence is incomplete in the sense that he did not read out everything in the dossier. So to me and you, the junta class, it is incomplete. But they have shared the dossier with the Gs of 16 countries, including P. So your G should be more informed...
Who is doing the hiding? The Indian minister is reading it out on nationwide broadcast TV. While Pakistan is BUSY conducting a closed doors in-camera investigation.
So you admit Pakistan responds to blackmail the degree of which corresponds to how far anyone is willing to go. I can tell you...
Anything unpalatable to you is not automatic BS.
If that is so , why has every one of your rulers met such a horrific end? I guess Mush was trying to outsmart the Pakistanis but there are people baying for the poor man's blood too. And after all he has done for you. Pooh!
@Developero:
How do you multiquote? I have not been able to figure out. Some help would be appreciated. I have resorted to a stop gap highlighting inline.
Bottom line is you have no standing of your own. In the first world. Your rant may find some echo in some Muslim countries but they dont want to loose historic linkages to India- because Pakistan can't has been acting the cry baby for a generation.
@AM:
"
do get around to further explaining with specificity what exactly this 'lop sided' Indo-Pak relationship should look like?
"
Bola to! If you are hung up on the word "lop sided" let me back away from it. Now I said ::ALREADY::, when Pakistan and India come to any table. How can they be...
Ok AM thats enough! PC goes to US. If the Pakistani Govt ends up prosecuting Saeed a few days down the line will you swallow your pride and eat your own words? The evidence I presented is by no means complete. It is only what Chiddu chose to reveal on a TV show! How can you take it as an end...
@AM:
"
What the maps suggest is that the lands comprising Pakistan have historically been part of empires that did not include what today comprises the Indian state. The same with the civilizations that largely existed in what is today Pakistan.
"
Well, you are referring Indus Valley...
@AM:
"
What the maps suggest is that the lands comprising Pakistan have historically been part of empires that did not include what today comprises the Indian state. The same with the civilizations that largely existed in what is today Pakistan.
"
And prey what civilizations were they? Let me...