Dude, you don't even know that the deck length you need for the launch zone is the length of the catapult, and the Ski Jump needs far longer than the length of the catapult?
The reason why the Ford class is longer is to be able to operate more aircraft on the deck at the same time, rather than...
Due, ski jumps require a longer deck than EMALS. . . .
In addition, the length of the 40,000-ton aircraft carrier deck is far less than that of Ford, don't you know?
Of course, there is no need for the Ford class. Why does the 27-ton aircraft only need a 40,000-ton aircraft carrier, but the 28-ton aircraft needs the Ford class? Bizarre idea.
No, I don't know why you think you need a size like USS FORD to carry EMALS.
Considering that you once thought that the Nimitz class carried 90,000 tons of aviation fuel, I think you are exaggerating the real number.
In fact the size of the de Gaulle class is enough to install EMALS
they have awful range and payload capacity taking off from STOBAR ships?
Stupid statement, the load of the J-15 on the aircraft carrier
2 pieces of 750kg yj-91
2 pieces of 650kg yj-88
2 pieces of 200kg PL-12
No, when carrying a load of about 1 ton, the combat radius of the F-35B is only about 800km, while the relative carrier-based aircraft J-15 is 1500km, and the j-31 is 1250km.
Strange data, as we all know, WS-15 is an engine with a thrust-to-weight ratio of 10. If the weight is 2500KG, it means that the thrust reaches 25 tons. . .
LOL, are you saying that the US will join the war in the Taiwan Strait goes to war 4 years later? WOW, this is really great news, may your dreams come true.LOL
yes, you are only interested in facts, your dreams are reality, such as the Perry class attacked by Iraq, such as the USS Panay sunk by the Japanese. I don't know what's wrong