Search results

Who is right about FDI? By way of contrast, Vietnam has seen FDIs grow by 61.2% year-on-year across the first three months of 2023, including a 62.1% increase in the number of new foreign-invested projects. ietnam attracted nearly 5.45 billion USD worth of foreign investment in the first...

Judging from the import data, consumer goods increased by 7%. The decline in imports is likely to be caused by domestic companies replacing some foreign imports in semiconductors and electromechanical products.

lol, dude, it's funny that you're denying the description of a professional after joint training with a French carrier. I've lost interest in continuing to discuss this topic with you, apparently you're substituting your own imagination for reality...

Dude, how do you feel about this passage? ? Apparently the USN disagrees with you. lol he navies of the two NATO allies know each other well and have participated in countless joint operations over the years. The French say that the pace is a bit more intense on a US carrier. “Our challenge is...

Dude, what do you mean by "you can see the defector lies right on the edge there"? In your screenshot the CAT2 does not go into the angled deck at all, while the de Gaulle's CAT is at least half on the angled deck. Dude, apparently I marked the e-2 location, so why are you talking about the F-18E?

dude, when did I say that the gate refers to the location of the CAT?

Dude, if you use a direct access deck, then you need to leave room for a failed landing and take off again, so the number of parking spaces on the deck will be reduced.lol Yes, because I was misled by you when you declared that CAT2 invaded angled decks. However, the screenshot you gave proves...

dude, so you should give me a screenshot of the plane invading the deck on the cat instead of this counterexample. Also, the wingspan is two wings, so that's 5m. . . .

lol, man. Thank you for the screenshot, it is ample evidence that the CAT did not intrude into the angled deck at all when the aircraft landed.

lol, dude, since the French are not prepared to take off and land at the same time as you say, they can certainly put the CAT on the angled deck. The angled deck offers better conditions for landing and re-launching than a straight deck, so why didn't the French use it?

Also, dude, the normal eye can see that the Cat 2 on the Nimitz is barely touching the edge of the angled deck, whereas the majority of the Cat 1 on the CDG is on the angled deck, even close to the centerline. I think you are comparing an elephant to a chicken.

LOL, DUDE. Haven't any pilots ever told you that all it takes is a gust of wind on the deck to cause an off-center landing? Margin, man, some margin is a must. The French should of course choose the Angled Deck, as it provides better landing conditions. The angled design, invented by Rear...

lol, dude didn't you see the picture in the link you gave yourself? Simultaneous takeoff and landing is possible because large carriers have takeoff points that do not interfere with the angled deck. The Charles de Gaulle did not have such a take-off point. So, you're using an elephant as a...

lol, dude. you are showing your ignorance. Didn't you know that Cat 1 is also ON the angled deck? When the plane lands, the entire angled deck must be clean. Instead of having aircraft interfere with landing on Cat 1. Of course, this is the normal level of dreaming for someone who believes that...

lol, have you seen them operate on CDG and Indian carriers? You see the Rafale and the Mig-29K taking off and landing on the sloping deck at the same time? Don't dream, dude.

lol, Cat and arresting at the same time when the takeoff location is in the angled runway？？？ Who told you that the takeoff and landing distances of the Rafale and the Mig-29 are so small that they can be performed on an angled deck at the same time? Of course, considering that you actually think...

So, here's an inexplicable point you've been holding on to Cat and arresting at the same time. Why do you want to do this? Obviously neither French nor Indian carriers can do this, so why are you insisting on this requirement?

Inexplicable statement? Didn't you know that the f-35c carries a 2000 lb Mk84 in combat with a takeoff weight of less than 28 tons? lol, the Rafale fighter can only execute around air superiority mission？

lol, why do you need to launch 28 tons instead of 27 tons? Since the F-18E takes off in the state of "Close to MTOW" Why can't a 28-ton aircraft do it?

lol 30 tons 28.2 tons is "Close to MTOW". 28 tons 27 tons isn't "Close to MTOW". Nonsensical sophistry, good night