Search results

The big Hindu fear: Pakistanis claiming to be Indian, by first claiming IVC, and now even pretending to be Indian in foreign countries. Pakistanis | STOP pretending as Indians in America after Mumbai Terrorist Attacks, Time Sq Plot.mp4 - YouTube

For the bolded part, I dont think you noticed the flags I have. I am sure Engineering in University of Waterloo is a much higher level of Academia than whatever Arts degree you are getting from Sheridan College. You are far from unbiased. As for sources, would a special western, unbiased and...

I think you are agreeing with the Indian point of view rather than disagreeing. Just like Urdu was born in UP but is adopted by Pakistan, IVC which was mostly in Pakistan (but also had significant parts in India) is adopted by India.

You are completely wrong to begin with, Aryan-Dravidian theory has been disproven by scientists. But for the sake of argument lets say this: Assuming your argument is correct, are you telling me that present day Pakistanis are offsprings of Dravidian Indus Valley people? Is that why Pakistan...

And how does it become YOUR national language? What do Balochis have to do at all with Urdu? How can you call it your national language?

I feel you are all over the place with your rebuttal. Even if Urdu is Persian/Turkic, it still has nothing to do with Pakistan geographically. Geographically, Urdu is a language born in UP, if you are going to dispute that then there is nothing that can be said as you are going against something...

The same way a Balochi like yourself that has nothing to do with Urdu can claim Urdu.

No matter how much you try to distort history, its never going to change the fact that Urdu is a language born in UP, India #justsaying Your troll baits are being wasted on me, find someone else, I only speak facts.

There is no such things as Aryans and Dravidians, it has been scientifically disproven. Stop sprouting BS in a debate.

I have a feeling you are here to troll and dont really care about debating, so I wont waste my time with you no more. Going by your definition, Urdu, Tipu Sultan, Mughals, Mohammed Bin Qasim, and many others are not Pakistani because geographically they have nothing to do with Pakistan...

Just like Urdu, Mughals, Tipu Sultan, Ghavnavi, Ghauri, Durrani, Mohammed Bin Qasim has nothing to do with Pakistan?

Why you speaking Urdu then, which is a language from UP? Geographically, Urdu has nothing to do with Pakistan.

You are actually agreeing with me (though you are trying to disagree). I was answering to the guy who said IVC is not Indian because of geography. I am just saying that if geography is going to be the sole indicator of who can claim what in the subcontinent, then going by that definition...

Urdu is from UP/Lucknow, this has been discussed 1000 times before. The reason Hindi and Urdu are so similar (when speaking, not text) is because they were both born in the same freaking place (UP). Its birth is in India, if you are going to claim IVC is not Indian because of geography, then...

1) It might not matter to you, but it matters in the context of IVC because you made a nation on your supposed "hate/difference/ dissimilarity/distinctness" to Hindus and now you are trying to claim Hindu civilization. You guys made a nation on pretty much "Hey we are completely different from...

What I find amusing is how can Pakistanis claim/be proud of the following if the only criteria to claiming history is supposedly Geographic location. These people had nothing to do with Pakistan geographically: All Mughal Emperors (Babur, Akbar, Humayun, Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb etc) - Indians by...

Two major differences between Egypt and Pakistan: 1) Egyptians did not make a nation on two nation theory. 2) Old Egyptian civilization was completely wiped out by the invasion of Islam, there is no one else left to claim ancient Egyptian civilization. That did not happen in India, we Hindus...

You sir have very well described the difference between you and us. This is the difference between Pakistanis and Indians regarding IVC. Indians claim IVC because we are the direct continuity of IVC, we speak Sanskrit and follow Hinduism. We claim IVC because thats our civilization in the...

Well then stop claiming the IVC if you dont think they were following the right religion or whatever. No matter how much you say, your civilization is the polar opposite of Sanskrit and Idol Worshipping which were the cornerstones of the great Indian civilization called Indus Valley Civilization.

Looks like Zaid sir has gone full R E T A R D, Never go full r e t a r d. Lol the Khalistan this retard has on the map would be Hindu majority anyways, so makes no sense if he is trying to create a Sikh homeland. Shows his level of (un)intelligence :hang2: P.S. to Indian Members: Its not...