Search results

OP starts with Indian economy and then end up at China after 2 posts. He is trolling his own thread. Amazing.

I agree with you. During his rule Pakistan was growing rapidly, India-Pakistan relations had grown to different heights and we were this close to solving Kashmir. But bigger powers in Pakistan had different plans and they got rid of him. Now they turned him into a fugitive.

Don't forget that it was during Delhiite Mussharraf's rule that Pakistan'e economy was growing rapidly. If he ruled longer Pakistan's economy would have been in a different place today. But y'all didn't let him continue. It's all been downhill since then.

Who's insulting Delhiites here ? No matter where they live India or Pakistan. They are my people. You have to go through me first.

I tried.

When you start insulting a member who is reasonably arguing without any jingoism based on whatever reports are available out there and a moderator likes your post, it shows the level to which this forum is falling. Got it move on then. Anyway, this thread has become a troll fest with a...

That article is written a Pakistani. Not proof. Please post your latest source about Galwan Valley.

That's not true. It is one of the officially accepted 23 disputed areas along the LAC as both sides acknowledge it. Someone one said that Chinese were on territory under Indian control. That is incorrect.

You or someone else said that Chinese are on territory under Indian control. That was wrong.

Media reports and satellite images. Even the knowledge about Pangong Tso I am getting is from the media. It was the same media which reported about Chinese incursions anyway. Today's discussions were primarily on Pangong Tso. True and that's a problem. That's why the standoff, that's why the...

It is disputed because there were counter claims. We would not let the Chinese patrol there if we didn't consider it disputed. In fact, both countries officially considered it as one of the 23 disputed areas along the LAC which had to be settled through talks. Now China is trying to...

That's a fact. Chinese use to patrol till Finger 4 which is their claim line. Indians used to patrol till Finger 8 which is India's claim line. Now, the Chine have tried to make a permanent presence just before Finger 4 and are not letting India patrol beyond Finger 4. When they would come...

Chinese have retreated from Galwan. The issue now is limited to Pangong Tso Lake area.

There is a great difference between "disputed area" and "area under India control". It's not semantics it's the truth which I am pointing out

Finger 4 to Finger 8 was not under Indian control. It was a disputed area and both armies used to patrol it. I have referred to it as a disputed area in my post that you quoted as well. What you heard in 70s is not proof. There is no record of her saying that anywhere.

Then it could be the other reasons I listed. Why don't you take guess why your CCP decided to unilaterally change the status quo that too at the time of a global pandemic.

You are the one claiming she said that. Burden of proof is on you to produce the video. Pakistanis have been claiming this since times immemorial to sooth their ego after the loss of 1971 but have never been able to produce any proof of her saying that. Investment could be true as well...

Domestic issues, global pressure due to the pandemic, India cosying up to China's enemies, India trying to divert investment away from China into itself, India developing heave infrastructure along the LAC. All of these are reasons.

I knew the talks won't yield results. The Chinese are out to prove a point. They have grabbed the disputed area between Finger 4 and Finger 8 at Pangong Lake limiting Indian patrols to Finger 4. I don't think they will leave. India should do the same in some other sector where there is...

As long as Pakistanis are enjoying it like a show. It's all good. But if they start treating it like their own history and start relating with it as if these are their ancestors then it could be sign of identity crisis which won't be good for them. There's as it is a lot of confusion there as...