Search results

check your pm, mate.

this arguement is flawed since there were large scale migrations of the hindus(to india) who were most likely the successors of those ancients . many pakistanis do claim foreign ancestory.

after going through some of the pages of the thread, it is clear that there is no point in arguing any further. you have your opinions and I have mine. lets agree to disagree.

and wat would US do if you start shooting down their drones? give you more aid?:hitwall:

maybe we did, after all gandhiji is our father of nation. I wonder wat would those bangladeshis would have done to them.;)

I see no reason to refute a fact. india accepted UN resolutions since it was a different situation then. now the situation has changed a lot. UN resolution were not binding, so india can refuse to abide by them. Has UN recognised the 'freedom fighters' as well? if you justify terrorism, then...

why do you assume that this is not happening already. an ULFA member who was caught revealed that ULFA had close relation with ISI and they were supplied weapons by the spy agency.:disagree:

I presume that they talk of baluchistan, when you guys try to teach things about democracy and secularism. that is the basis for animosity. we try to teach you and you try to teach us, when clearly neither of us is interested in learning from the other. so we should simply accept each other...

wat was there to be refuted? when you went on and on with narrating the past events, then I just reminded that it was history. nothing to refute. when you said that terrorists in kashmir are 'freedom fighters', I thought you were justifying their acts just because they are acting with an...

you are trying to justify terrorists by justifying the supposed 'cause'. this is just hogwash. history. history. UN resolutions are no longer relevent. india doesnt share pak's view that kashmir is disputed. anyway, UN resolutions are not binding.

wat someone says before a camera is not important, but where they cast the vote in the secrecy. they have chosen a govt and CM who is as indian as anyone else. pakistan has not stopped crossborder terrorism,PaOK is used as a launching pad for incursions into indian territory. if US wants to...

no fault of pakistan, consiparcy of west/india/world, is that so?:hitwall:

I know about king bharata, I was just giving you approximate locations, I dont know the exact locations myself. anyway, wats the point for asking that question?

mahabarat war took place in kurukshetra, near modern delhi. hastinapur was situated on the bank of ganga. the war was fought among the indian kings from various states. from gandhar(afghanistan) to nagaland, and kashmir to tamilnadu, the kings participated on two sides. backtrack from wat?

I dont see any conflict in my views and flint's. if you see, plz show.

yes, but india was much bigger at that time extending till gandhar(afghanistan).

you misunderstood me. bharat varsha is the name and that name was not based in any way on indus/sindu. sindu is just another river in bharata varsha just like ganga or godavari. sindu has no special importance.

the right word is bharata khand that has no relation with indus or sindhu as claimed or imagined.

yes, protests should be peaceful and not violent, but there was no protest in elections. they chose pro-delhi parties and completely rejected the separatists' call for boycott. so one shouldnt view those elections as violence. the rest of the post is your opinion and I dont share it...

they have suffered till now due to terrorism not allowing them to assert their rights in elections. this time they were allowed and they gave the decision. the govt formed is pro-delhi. that speaks for itslef.