Search results

An American said: "... do yourself a favor, write a manuscript of "what I said" and shuve it to *********. No one is interested what you have said in 2000406 words. Your hate and anger is understandable since Vedas are Aryan documents of their conquests and spoils of India, they called Native...

An American responded to the above with:- "What George Bush started will take many more years to resolve. Cost thousands of lifes and continue to drain the US government. And it may end up with nuclear weapons in the wrong hands - and who said GW was wrong about WMD's" And another American...

An American asked 'What gave you the idea that Afghanistan is a part of traditional India?' My reply:- I have said:- i) “The only place on Earth where the classical culture, of which Greece was one branch, still exists, is rural North India.” ii) “At the height of its Golden Age, the...

These are comments I have posted today on Boston.com in response to a Boston Globe editorial about the Taliban:- When it comes to love and admiration for their firangi enemies, most Pakistanis are no different from Indians, but, as I have said, in Pakistan there are movements -- Jihadi...

To see how India is actually governed at present, see post # 1 of the following thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html On December 18, 2008, I said:- "...a fundamental distinction needs to be made between Russian intelligence...

The illegitimate, traitor 'government' in New Delhi cannot enter into any IAEA agreements for India. No IAEA inspections of any Indian facilities, beyond those that were under such inspections on January 1, 2006, will be allowed. Even those facilities that were under IAEA inspections on January...

On an Indian defence forum, someone who took part in building, with Israeli help, the radar imaging satellite that India just launched, recalls: " I was with Indian Space prior to my retirement and I was part of the 8 or 10 ( just a handful ) people's group which was formed for this...

Nuclear weapons and their delivery systems are important. No less important is the strategy in their use. In post # 7 above I said: I have emphasised, in bold, the last sentence. THINK about what it says and how that is true.

In another thread, I mentioned the Tamil Rakshas K. Subrahmanyam -- responsible for all C.I.A.-RAW-sponsored separatism and terrorism in the Indian subcontinent since 1983 and, before that, participant in the creation of the insurgency in East Pakistan that led to the creation of Bangladesh, as...

The first and foremost point is that the United States has absolutely no right to be in Afghanistan and both India’s and Pakistan’s primary concern should be to militarily eject the United States and NATO forces from Afghanistan. Pakistan’s president and prime minister who talk of fighting the...

Any other questions, children? (Don't be distracted by attempts of C.I.A.-RAW operatives here to derail the thread with irrelevant posts). About how Pakistan can deliver its nuclear weapons to the United States, I have said the following on this board which I am bringing together with the...

On January 25, 2008, I said, in part:- "Another important point is that weapons such as tanks and fighter planes which carry human beings are a lot more difficult to design and produce than, say, intercontinental ballistic missiles which give a million times or more returns for the same...

On December 25, 2008, I wrote:- "Another point that needs to be made is the capacity of countries like India and Pakistan, with a low degree of urbanisation, to survive a full-fledged nuclear war against a country such as the United States which has a high degree of urbanisation. If both...

I have said that just two nuclear warheads of even twenty kilotons each delivered to Washington and New York will increase India's power millions of times. These will be accompanied with a warning of similar deliveries to additional cities such as Chicago if there is any retaliation. These two...

All these inferior, seditious people -- Manmohan Singh, Advani, Mukherjee, etc. -- talk of being prime minister. Is any of them talking about India using its nuclear arms against the United States, which will increase India's power millions of times? Are the media? Are the 'strategic experts'...

On September 1, 2008 I wrote:- "In my letter dated June 27, 2004 ... I wrote “Technology, however, is necessary but not sufficient for independence; if the perceived willingness -- perceived by yourself and others -- to use your arms is zero, their value -- deterrent and other -- is...

The following points need to be emphasized:- 1. The actual USE of nuclear weapons increases your power millions of times. By controlling your behavior into not using them -- this can be done by physical (including contact), chemical, financial or verbal/behavioral/psychological means...

In his speech at the U.N. conference on racism, the Iranian president spoke the absolute truth and nothing but the truth when he said : “Following World War II, they resorted to military aggression to make an entire nation homeless under the pretext of Jewish suffering. They sent...

The following is adapted from a post I made in a different thread and is being cross-posted here as a preliminary to the main point:- ------------------------------------------------------------ Quote from an earlier post of mine:- “I have a certified letter, return receipt requested, from...

As an example of how C.I.A.-RAW uses its control of the Indian media (see post # 1 of the following thread: http://www.defence.pk/forums/india-defence/16042-raw-indias-external-intelligence-agency.html ) to control the behavior of politicians, for a couple of days, the media provided saturation...