Search results

So you are telling me people couldnt go to bike trips across pakistan using the best roads that country has to offer?

Indian troops there rushed in august are all Para military, If India attacks, it wont be with Para military...:/

India should learn from China. Its not about giving away few vessels, Its about setting up networking facilities, for which the main processing takes place back home using our assets in the space. Thats how you set up iron ties, even if relationship sours, you know the other nation will think...

the accused were caught on camera and were caught without any delay. There is no framing innocents. They had confessed.

https://www.financialexpress.com/defence/indian-air-force-to-get-deadly-akash-missiles-places-order-for-7-squadrons-of-made-in-india-missile-system/1783341/ IAF silently telling lobbies to **** off. Air Chief RKS Bhaduria has been very vocal for the local solutions, he won't fall prey to...

No no, you got that wrong. You meant to say 'Pakistan Exclusive Economic Zone'. Dealing? You mean, putting out a worded statement against 'freedom of navigation' movement in Taiwan strait is dealing? lol okay.

Paving way for S400? These 2 systems are even remotely not comparable. I am actually looking at it from a 'Spyder' lens. Recent spat between Rafale and DRDO regarding MPATGM and now this.....Rafael stands to benefit directly from this.

IN be like: No, Shoo Shoo...(just like you do to a stray dog). :big_boss:

Thankful for that, all military projects should be cam shy, especially ones like AC or BMD!

Ahh the stupidity of some people knows no bounds.....:hitwall::hitwall::hitwall:

China has a large coastline, why not use it for rocket launch? Sure the mainland may be more cost effective, but atleast on coast there wont be risk of such accidents!

what exactly did i overestimate? That IAF wont be able to easily take BD af? or that IN wont easily take our BN?

What a shitshow is this thread? Yes I know it's hypothetical, but the responses from posters are laughable. They are *sure* of what BD will use, but *doubtful* India will use full spectrum of assets available to it. 1. Someone says 'BD troops can hold Indian army foot advance if they dig in'...

That's interesting....

Anyways....the issue has been resolved, Other student unions came in support of teacher and even RSS has supported the teacher. And no, the teacher didnt go into hiding, he sent a letter to the VC of BHU that he is going to his village....

@The Eagle Already reported his posts....this one here too.

:crazy::crazy::crazy::crazy: The text in blue color on the website signifies link, click on it and you will find it. But I understand how it can be a complicated process for someone like you, so I have made it easy for you and posted the links here. Will you be able to read or should i copy the...

https://missilethreat.csis.org/ find them urself on this depository. PS:- Post reported for language.

Navy had already refused Tejas, an LCA doesn't have a place on AC. DRDO went ahead with the program to validate the things it had developed which can now be incorporated in the naval variant of AMCA.

That's why we have Prithvi 3/Dhanush. You may wanna know that Prithvi 2 has a CEP of 50m whereas comparable Pak missile Hatf 3 has CEP of 250m! Dhanush has 25m CEP and payload capacity of upto 1000kg. Even Hatf 4 carries 700kg warhead with a CEP of 200m albeit at a range of 700km, but for that...