You have to read this article, because whatever happens in the next 20 years in Pakistan will have strong roots in reasons described in here.
Click the source link at the end, to access documents linked to within the article itself.
David Steven is a fellow at the Center on International...
Pakistan would in all probability reply back by using stand-off weapons against the airbases the aircrafts took off from, and use subs against Indian naval vessels in the area.
Gitmo files listed Pakistan intel service, the ISI, as a terrorist-affiliated org.
US authorities listed the main Pakistani intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate (ISI), as a terrorist organisation alongside groups such as al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah and Iranian...
About the box shaped tubing of NASR and circular tubing of photographed A-100 MRLS, here's Kanwa's complete article informing about the sale of this weapon system.
From the last paragraph:
Source: UPIAsia
As for the range question, it might be a deliberate attempt to state a shorter range?
You, Sir, are quite frankly wasting your words, trying to convince people who do not want to be convinced. I'd really suggest that you start penning your thoughts, publishing them on a proper platform will be a lot more worth your while.
I'm really not in to debate for the sake of a debate. Pray just explain as to whether Army's opposition (as you mentioned) to drone strikes start after the 2008 elections, or before it?
If that was the general view across the board within the army and its top brass, why did Pakistan share AFBs...