Search results

It reduces clutter, we dont need 5 threads on the same topic, and you chinese always post in packs on different areas of the website.

Oh yea forgot, they also blame us for meteor strikes, the weather, and all political upheaval, anywhere. I'm surprised they havn't called us aliens from outer space yet! Who knows maybe some have :rolleyes:

If the missile is aimed at Tokyo the PAC-3 can intercept it in the terminal stage.

Its a very nice start!

They blame us for natural disasters, why not disease and famine too?

technically true, but for the sake of everyone involved a reliable weapon should be defined as one that has undergone multiple successful tests in their intended operational environment, whether as part of a war exercise or a standalone test. This doesn't necessarily have to include simulated...

crackpots in every country, people on here are more the fools for extrapolating these rantings to the rest of the Japanese population. Heck we even have resident crackpots on this forum! Unfortunately in North Korea the crackpot is in charge.

why the angry face? This seems like a perfectly reasonable countermeasure.

RIP for the dead but In before the US is blamed.

China does not have the missile as a reliable weapon... unless you consider the US already having lasers and railguns.

No, you are the liar. North Korea has nothing economic to threaten other countries with, its threats are obvious to everyone, if you can't see it you simply aren't looking, instead you are hiding in the dark, like a mushroom. If you cannot see how North Korea is provoking the rest of Asia by...

How is india even a threat to Australia? :what:

That's not true at all, it is North Korea that is constantly terrorizing the rest of Asia and China that defends them for its own interests. Look at reality more carefully.

What is your fixation with the Yalu River? The US can bring China to a standstill conventionally without troops on the Yalu. As for China annexing North Korea, that is a viable option that won't start a war with the US, if there was a misunderstanding with my previous post. That only applies to...

Any source providing real details on this 'peace treaty' offered? I suspect there is more than meets the eye. I'm talking about something more than 'Kim demands peace treaty' or 'Kim offers peace treaty', something with details. In anycase North Korea has shown itself to be untrustworthy, so...

huh, either i forgot to post my response or it was removed. To be brief, this isn't a game of risk and the benefits of 'more land' does not outweigh the economic, regional, and international consequences of being stuck with developing North Korea and the economic humanitarian crisis that is a...

Delusions of grandeur aside Martian, explain what possible benefit China would gain from annexing not just a North Korea, whose economy is non-existent, but a nuked South Korea with a shattered economy? Lets ignore that North Korea nuking South Korea would be the worst case nightmare for China...

The article contradicts you, you don't like it email Ronald O’Rourke. Your argument that the US doesn't have it because China' will always stay one step ahead' is rather weak and a circular argument. American weapons have been proven against Russian and Chinese equipment, and realistic...

It sounds like you are the bitter one.

Wow, that's the first I heard that South Korea's current president's mother died by the hands of North Korea. Tragic.