Search results

@mehboobkz : I thought Rahul does not want to be PM. Listen to his speech at the Congress Chintan Shibir. In any case, without even holding a Cabinet post or ministry so far, he is unlikely to become PM straightaway.

Yes. He is generally pro-India and also supported India during the Indo-US nuclear deal. That is all the more dangerous because his statements(being such a staunch supporter) blaming India will be taken more seriously.

I don't know of any Indian response in 2011. It came only after the video resurfaced this week. That is not enough. India should demand privately that USA clarifies its stand in public. They should be hounded into a clear statement.

The so called 'damage control' is always from some unrelated figure. Enough deniability for Hagel any day later to say 'I told you so' if India indeed decides to create troubles for Pakistan tomorrow. I am not worried about Pakistan's text books. It is how their diplomats sell Hagel's...

I would remind you about a certain Indo-Pak joint statement made in Sharm-el-Sheikh. It is now considered an egg on India's face. It DOES matter who SAYS what.

So, by your logic, we should not obsess over Godhra because it happened 10 years ago?! Over Babri because it happened 20 years ago?! Check your brain once. Criminals should not be let go however late it gets. There has to be an obsession to get them punished. It is your lack of obsession that...

No buddy. US did not reject it enough. I am surprised at how India ignored the comments so easily. His comments are going to end up in ****** textbooks in Pakistan as proof of India's involvement. Even sensible people like Najam Sethi will(if he already did not) pick up such statements. And...

Thanks for the video. First time seeing it. She amazingly justified the move in her trademark manner. It still is a petty vote bank move. Protecting intellectual freedom is a matter of principle. She could have talked to the distributors and explained them how many centres could be...

:rofl: Who? The very same Musharraf who attacked India just after the two PM's has started talks? Sure he bent over backwards and it is India's fault they did not take the sign.

Isn't she the true pseudo-secular politician in Indian politics? She banned Kamal Hassan's movie to appease some Muslim morons. And the writer of OP claims it is a secular move!! If she is hot-headed, I think that is good for one term. She can kcik some a** against non-performing entities...

Hmm... You can be as cold as you want. But I suggest you the alternative real fair game. It is to attack the police, the state's organ. This, I guess, would be legitimate because laws of war sort of allow attacks on them. But I guess some poor Jamaat activists already tried to overrun the police...

FYI Shahbag protesters are also muslims. Why would I support them if I hate muslims? And if I hate Islam, I cannot live in the city and the country I live in. What I hate is Islamist radicalism and their dreams of Islamic supremacy over the world. I am not prejudiced. I judge them for what...

Sure you would say so. Your country sets the example for people who want to move on into future, forgetting what LeJ and TTP do on a daily basis. They killed a hundred shias today? Sure forget it and move on. Let us build the nation while we let loose murderers. Let us not be obsessed with...

In this particular case, you can go through the judgement and see why people raised concerns. Even if you disagree with some of them who downright say Afzal was framed, you will see why people are rightly concerned. Where else would the 'alleged mastermind'(Geelani) of the attack get acquitted...

Not only that. US is unreliable as an ally. Their aid, help and friendship is all conditional. If you arms, you cannot attack certain countries with them. If you are in trouble from certain countries they won't help. And in times of dire need, US does not help its allies if it thinks it has no...

So Kashmir solution will make Pakistan normal. If Pakistan becomes normal, it will make a stronger claim on Kashmir(with more international support unlike now where they are treated as pariahs). So why should India ever take initiative? In fact this is the right time for India to declare...

You claim to be an angel of facts and yet you misstate that all 92,000 who died in J&K were killed by 'Indian state'. Indian government puts the number of total killed at around 40,000 including civilians killed by militants, military, and those among armed forces, police and militants who died...

The high court got no petition to move the temple. For a hundredth time, read the thread I have linked. You will know why I suggest the temple be moved. Instead you keep ranting here. I will not reply next time. And if you think a temple next to Charminar hurts my pride, I will quote Kumar...

Say it brother. They won't rest until you say BNP is the only true patriot party in Bangladesh and AL is an Indian RAWAMY stooge. :)

Ok. I admit I initially made the statement without proof. I guess I trusted too much in my history teacher. :P It is not hard to search for anecdotal evidence. I did one search for you. on www.jainsamaj.org ( Jainism, Ahimsa News, Religion, Non-Violence, Culture, Vegetarianism, Meditation...