Search results

Don't look down on IPhone. That's the product of combination of the best parts from 1st and 2nd economy in the world. Anyway, China is leading in radar 3d imaging ---- they achieved the best resolution already, that's the area only touched by US and China.

You just can not understand. It's beyond your range. As I said below the pic "According to Maxwell's physics, electric and magnetic fields will not care it is called J-20 or F-22, canard or main wings.", whatever you called (Oh, a N1 baby also know how to ID, you need not to show off), its just...

You pace is froze, too slow to catch up.

No, you dont have. AC2AC.

Russia, India, China, none of them did have real aircraft carrier battle experiences. Only USA and Japan imperial Navy really had it.

September 15, 2012.

Wow, its 2nd half is really holly big... and it will form corner reflector in particular situation which J-20's canard will not. F-22, you are really old fashion.

Your proud F-22 is a lame duck. It's just one of the failed projects in USAF history. Till 19 Nov, 2013, 5 F-22 had crashed, in the sky, on runway, taking off or landing, anywhere, anytime. And, was rumoured shot down in Jordan and China. Accidents/Flying hours ration is high, only 2nd after...

Don't underestimate Chinese and their engines. New leaks from Snowden showed a F135 type engine is testing on the road: Stealthy Powerful

You want her number? It's not difficult to see a senior Chinese beard like this.

There would have difference only in a war: 1st, it's difficult and risk to apply treatment on the wounded hairy skin. 2nd, shaved head will seal the mask better.

J-20 does have smaller V-tails just half of F-22's. V-fin is going to be removed, who knows.

No need talk too much to him. He repeated copy and paste his 1980's infant stealthy physics again and again. He is too old to remember what he'd lied and believed they are true after thousands times of cheating. He is blind at F-22's 1)two giant V-tails, 2) two giant main wings 3) big gaps btw...

Interesting, 2003+?

Sounds like you are new of the image process. 1) The same resolution 50" and 60" TV display at different physical size and thus cast different visual field for viewer. That's why people prefer bigger screen, if TV is not enough, go for IMAX. Another good example is 2x the iphone app on IPad...

1) The wiki is talking about resolution, not about the panel size. You were confused at an ending of 4K is worse than VGA. 2)Wiki is wrong to illustrate by using a blur the image here. (the 2nd picture file name is 581px-Matakis_-_blurred.jpg. The up-scaling will never lose any original data...

That's a trick. Since you know how to use photoshop, you should know you did it wrongly. You blurred the image which means you removed the details. The actual image displayed on different TV will be as below: Now, you tell me, do you want big TV? IPhone4 and IPhone5S have the same panel...

F-22 is too old, same as you. You are all outdated. F-22 is a cold-war product, all the things its revolved, the technology, computing, material, theories, machining, all at the age of intel 286. Computer power used for J-20 design and simulation is roughly equal to all the computer bonding...

You now don't want to compare the size, old man? Don't cheat yourself, you may don't know the physics, but we know what you are trying to do. Take a flashlight and turn off all the light, put your two high-glossy boxes on a table, then you will find the real rules.

Of course it is. Software is important, does not mean it is more important than hardware. Whatever the software you used, you cannot change a 50' TV to 60' or a phone-camera to a DSLR. You can always get more powerful (range and detail) on a bigger size AESA ---- say, with same module on F-35...