However I wouldn't mind identifying myself a Hong Konger but I won't identify as Cantonese because your appearance always sticks how. I think being Cantonizes only works on people of East Asian Mongoloid descent
Does Jackie Chan and all Hong Kong people identify as Cantonese? I always felt Hong Kong people were different. I was born from Hong Kong and studied there so I can speak Cantonese pretty well even without learning it in school. I learned it simply from speaking TVB like all my other families...
What's ethnicity is Jackie Chan? Do you know he is very popular in India? I like all his movies and Hong Kong Cantonese speaking action movies from 1990's
However I'm sure people like you treat all Indians as Indians?
Would you acknowledge the difference of being a Brahmin or a Gujarati? ( let alone if they were broke down into sub-ethnicity ?)
Are Ningbonese even a Chinese sub-ethnic group? they are just people from Ningbong. What you mean is Wu people.
Perharps Hakka have inferior complex or other have inferior complex that is why they need to claim significant historical figures
It's just like how other Indians are jealous of...
I find Indian and Chinese so similar. Even among themselves they both strive to be the best and strive to be superior than the others.
The caste system is sick, it made Indians fighting against themselves and striving to be the best among all group so they can never get discriminated by other...
But who are the highest class and lowest class? Are Tanka a low class group among Chinese? in India even we have countless low class group but only a few top seed groups. Be thankful to God if you're on the top class
About the Tanka
The differences between the sea dwelling Tanka and land...
Are Shanghainese a special group among Chinese? I search wikipedia and it says they have the richest city in China although I'm not sure if this includes Hong Kong/Macau since their both like some kind of special administrative region with their own rules, governments
I'm only saying what they did and what they achieved is similar. For example the Indian independence movement could never happened had it not been the Brahmin and Gujarati the same applies to the Xinhai revolution to Hakka and Cantonese.
I read something about Hakka and Cantonese being superior class or higher class. And that mainlanders jealous of Hong Kong Cantonese
The Hakka are leaders and that is why they are still leaders today. The Cantonese are privileged with cultural hub such as Hong Kong and Macau that is why they...
Then Hakkas are president in many countries. They were the first president of China, Taiwan and Singapore, also prime minister in Thailand, Burma they were also the first president in Guyana.
The Cantonese have large significant cultural and linguistic influence due to HK entertainment like...
H
Mao zedong was also a founder.
However no person from India can deny that only 2 groups founded what is today modern India. Basically Brahmin was the highest class, the top seed of the country while the Gujarati was a striving cultural force that led it to happen. You also can't deny that...
Exactly and he is from the Brahmin group. Too many people are forgetting what our ancestors did.
The Brahmin, Punjabis, Tamils, Gujarati, Bengalis are the most successful groups in India.